Not photo related but…

We lost our sixteen year old cat last night, poor old guy.  He’d been having health problems for the last year and Friday morning it was pretty obvious he wasn’t going to last the weekend.  Started looking through my old files and realized  I don’t have many pictures of him, and none that are really good.  But I’m a photographer amirite?  Fortunately my brother in law took this one a few years ago at my daughter’s high school graduation.  So long Quincy, we’ll miss ya!

Quincy

Fun with exposure: Things You Can Do in a Museum

The light meter in your digital camera, be it an SLR or a point & shoot, is a pretty darned sophisticated piece of electronic wizardry.  Throw the meter into matrix mode, point your lens at a scene and shoot it, you’re going to get a “correct” exposure.  The problem is, a correct exposure might not be what you’re looking for; your creative eye will look at a given scene and see it very differently from how the dead accurate, but unimaginative, meter does.

This neon art at the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston serves two purposes.  It’s art, and it is a nice way to present the museum do’s and don’ts to visitors.  The piece is located near the main gift shop in a well lit lobby.  I took a couple of snap shots of the sign because it made me chuckle, but then started to wonder how I could make it a semi-worthwhile photo.

The neon is mounted on a stark white wall in a largely white room, pretty uninteresting as a photographic background.  Blue light shining out of a black hole though would look pretty cool…outer space like even.  How to make it happen?  There are two light sources in this photo. One is the neon lights (conveniently that also happens to be our subject) and the ambient room lighting.  I’m no genius with light, but solution to this problem is pretty simple; get a base exposure for the scene (which ended up being 1/30 sec, f8, ISO 800) and then work the shutter speed til you kill the ambient.  Starting with that exposure, I took a series of shots, upping the shutter speed about 1/2 stop for each one; if I was good I could have guessed at the right shutter speed but I’m not.  I ended up getting the effect I wanted at 1/160 sec, f8, ISO 800.  The ambient light is gone completely and all we have is our funny neon artwork.

Copyright @ 2012 Adrian M. Benson Nikon D200, Nikkor 16-85mm AF-S VR, 1/160 sec, f8, ISO800 Neon artwork, MFA Boston RAW file processed in Photoshop Elements 10 w/Adobe Camera RAW

Awesome Photographs That Aren’t Mine

My brother in law sent me a link the other day that I want to share with you all here.  It’s a selection of 4×5 Kodachromes made mostly during WWII.  It’s unusual enough to see color photos from that era as color reversal film was still fairly new (Kodachrome was introduced in 1935) and expensive to process.  We’re extremely spoiled as photographers today.  Our digital SLR’s are more computerized image processors than they are cameras and with the luxury of post processing in Photoshop that can allow someone with a little skill to make a good image out of a horrible exposure, many “photographers” don’t worry much about getting things right during the shot.

So visit this link and revel in the beautiful images made when you got it right “in camera” or else.

http://pavel-kosenko.livejournal.com/303194.html?thread=22669914